Anyone have any thoughts on this article? Ted Kaczynski has been saying basically the same thing for more than 20 years and yet no one listened. In Kaczynski's latest books "Technological Slavery" and "Anti-Tech Revolution," he explains why palliative solutions offered by Harari are totally useless.
It certainly seems to me that all of the articles published in the mainstream press that are supposedly "critical" of technology follow the same formula: They outline the horrific effects of technology on our society, then propose utterly naive and totally vague ways to "manage" or "control" the situation--and that's if they don't just say that we all need to "think" about how to "manage" or "control" the situation. Most of all, they always put forth the notion, either explicitly--but more often tacitly--that technological progress is "inevitable." Never is the concept of "inevitability" questioned. The effect of articles like this are to produce apathy and hopelessness in the reader.
I read that article (and I am constantly finding similar ones in the 'mainstream'), and I agree with your assessments that Dr. Kaczynski addresses the problems (often in theory, before they became visible problems) and he dismantled the predictable but inadequate solutions that would be offered by those attached to Tech.
Such writers often conclude, "We need to have an honest conversation" about what Tech is doing vs. what we want, or (like you mention) "We must think about how we manage/control technology", which are vaguely meaningless suggestions.
However, when you write that such pieces "produce apathy and hopelessness in the reader" I have to ask if this is your reaction? I suspect not, and it certainly isn't mine. I'm not expecting The Atlantic, et al, to publish a deeper critique that envelopes techno-industrial Civilization itself, but I find these pieces useful nonetheless.
Think of a boulder you couldnt budge, and then suppose it begins tumbling, perhaps not going precisely where you wanted to send it, but now with inertia you couldn't impose: Might you direct that inertia it has gained?
To this point, the article "Machine Politics" (Harper's Magazine, Jan 2019) was only okay for a few good points and quotable lines. The two readers' letters subsequently published ddressed the points that the author might mistake a feature for a bug, and that there is no solace in *contouring public opinion* against the far-Right or for the Left rather than leaving people un-manipulated on a mass scale.
None of this explicitly speaks to a base critique of Civilization or Tech, but in my eyes all of it points to this implicitly - and that's precisely where we come in, ain't it? The cracks are showing, and our efforts must deliver into them ever-wider wedges.
Admin: Hey, we have just got everything in order and are inviting people to join our website. Welcome to all new members!
Jan 9, 2019 8:09:53 GMT
Kot: Looking forward to the first Newsletter
Jan 10, 2019 1:07:07 GMT
whynot555: I have received the letter and salute you ;-)
Jan 22, 2019 12:43:54 GMT
whynot555: Hi ! I have received the letter... so I salute you admins (and others) ;-)
Jan 22, 2019 12:44:54 GMT
autonomousfuture: 100% - definitely hyped to see what the newsletter will say.
Jan 22, 2019 19:49:15 GMT
Kot!: Another wave of folk, neat.
Jan 23, 2019 13:29:22 GMT
Admin: Hey all! Feel free to introduce yourself in the Introduce yourself thread. It isn't mandatory but encouraged as it creates a more close community on this website.
Feb 17, 2019 10:47:43 GMT
kg: Hi! New here. I always felt there was a strong connection between aggression and depression AND lack of public natural spaces (i.e. public parks) and an increase in technological dependency. Thoughts or articles on this, anyone?
Apr 2, 2019 3:43:04 GMT
kot: Incase the person is here who constantly makes Ted Kaczynski threads on 4chan /pol/ and /lit/. Please stop it.
May 19, 2019 19:59:08 GMT